Skip to main content

Industries

Defence & public sector

Classification boundaries, accreditation, and environments where the update path is a project in its own right.

What makes this sector different

Classification boundaries

Systems that span classifications are governed by rules that assume no automated flow across them. Design has to start there.

Accreditation

Approval is a process with its own evidence requirements and its own timeline, and it is rarely compatible with iterating in production.

Genuine air gaps

Not restricted egress, absent egress. Dependency resolution, telemetry and model updates all need rethinking rather than configuring.

Long service life

Systems outlive the frameworks they were built on. Anything with a retention requirement has to be framework-independent.

Workloads that come up

  • Technical documentation and standards retrieval
  • Engineering change impact analysis
  • Intelligence and open-source summarisation within a boundary
  • Bid and requirement traceability
  • Maintenance record analysis

Frameworks in play

ISO/IEC 42001NIST AI RMFNational accreditation frameworksSupply-chain integrity requirements

Two patterns we deploy here

Air-gapped grounded assistant

Self-hosted quantised model over a documentation corpus, with a signed-media supply line, an internal registry and a rehearsed rollback.

Provenance-first deployment

Artefact identifiers carried across the boundary intact, deployment records tying digests to serving windows, and model identity recorded on every inference.

Related case studies →

Start with the constraint.

Most of these projects are shaped by what you cannot do rather than what you want. Data that cannot leave the estate, a model you cannot host with a third party, a decision somebody has to justify to a regulator. Tell us yours and we will say honestly whether we can work inside it.